I don’t know what the hubub is about. Sure on some occasions Brooke Hogan looks like a chick, but far too often she just looks a bit too much like her pappa. Maybe she lifts too much or something; I don’t know.
Well, the folks at Playboy don’t seem to mind shooting more manly women. As if the Chyna shoot wasn’t bad enough. Well the NY Daily news is reporting Brooke might be on board:
Brooke Hogan has been approached to pose nude for the famous men’s magazine, her publicist told the Daily News on Wednesday. And she didn’t say no.
The “Brooke Hogan Knows Best” star, 20, could use a boost for her stagnant singing career. Hogan’s 2006 album “Undiscovered” reportedly sold just 127,000 copies.
But her father, WWE legend Hulk Hogan, likely won’t be too thrilled with the idea. The Hulkster had no qualms about showing off his overbearing paternal side on the now-defunct VH1 reality show “Hogan Knows Best.”
Brooke has posed for a men’s magazine in the past (she appeared on the cover of FHM in a skimpy bikini in 2006), but has never posed nude.
“No decision has been made at this time,” her rep said.
Meh. I just can’t get all that excited.
Let’s pretend for a second that I have a subscription to Playboy, which I don’t since I get laid so much and the thought of looking at ugly skanks like the ones they have in there just makes my penis hurt since the quality of tail I get exceeds it by a factor of 10. (yes, I am getting help for my pathological lying) I know that I won’t be all that excited to see Brooke Hogan nude. I imagine it’ll go down as one of the few times I’ve actually skipped the celebrity nude photospread.
Good job ruining a good thing, Playboy.
*yes, I realized I tagged this post as ‘hot chicks’ it’s against my better judgment but I know there will be 900 searches for Brooke Hogan nude that will boggle my mind proving that my derision of Playboys decision won’t be shared by everyone.
Popularity: unranked [?]
